Labour market expectations and occupational choice: evidence from teaching

Publication type

Journal Article

Series Number

Author

Publication date

August 1, 2025

Summary:

This paper investigates why teachers quit. Using new survey data and a modified discrete-choice experiment we find that i) teachers are systematically misinformed about population earnings, and misinformation is correlated with quitting intentions; ii) non-pecuniary factors are the most cost-effective method of reducing teacher attrition; and iii) quitting intentions are more affected by reductions in workplace amenities than symmetric improvements, suggesting preventing cuts is more important than rolling out more generous benefits. Linking our survey data to teachers’ administrative records we show that teachers probabilistic leaving intentions are strong predictors of actual behaviour.

Published in

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Volume

Volume: 236:107096

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107096

ISSN

01672681

Subjects

Notes

Open Access

Under a Creative Commons license

#588698

---

Related Publications

• Advanced British Standard: A-level replacement will require more teachers – but bonuses may not be the way to get them

  1. Joshua Fullard

  Media
  October 5, 2023

• Teachers are quitting – here’s what could be done to get them to stay

  1. Joshua Fullard

  Media
  April 17, 2023

• Labour market expectations and occupational choice: evidence from teaching

  1. Joshua Fullard

  Research Paper
  March 11, 2023

• Labour market expectations and occupational choice: evidence from teaching

  1. Joshua Fullard

  ISER Working Paper Series
  March 3, 2023