Publication type
Research Paper
Author
Publication date
March 11, 2023
Summary:
Using new data on teachers’ intentions to leave the profession, subjective expectations about labour market outcomes and a modified discrete-choice experiment we find that i) teachers are systematically misinformed about population earnings, and misinformation is correlated with attrition intentions; ii) non-pecuniary factors are the most cost-effective method of reducing teacher attrition; and iii) attrition intentions are more affected by reductions in workplace amenities than symmetric improvements, suggesting preventing cuts is more important that rolling out more generous benefits. Linking our survey data to teachers’ administrative records we provide the first evidence that teachers attrition intentions are strong predictors of actual behaviour.
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4384928
Subjects
#557734
Related Publications
-
Advanced British Standard: A-level replacement will require more teachers – but bonuses may not be the way to get them
- Joshua Fullard
Media
October 5, 2023 -
Teachers are quitting – here’s what could be done to get them to stay
- Joshua Fullard
Media
April 17, 2023 -
Labour market expectations and occupational choice: evidence from teaching
- Joshua Fullard
ISER Working Paper Series
March 3, 2023