Skip to content

ISER Working Paper Series 2014-32

Dependent interviewing and sub-optimal responding

Authors

Publication date

16 Sep 2014

Abstract

With proactive dependent interviewing respondents are reminded of the answer they gave in the previous interview, before being asked about their current status. We examine the risk that respondents falsely confirm the answers from the previous interview as still applying, using data from a panel survey in which preload data about receipt of welfare benefit contained errors. A large proportion of respondents confirmed the false preload. Respondents with a more complex history of receipt, according to linked administrative records, were more likely to confirm. Personality also seemed to matter. Predictors of satisficing and characteristics of the survey and interviewer were not predictive of confirming the false preload.

Subjects

Welfare Benefits and Survey Methodology

Paper download  


Related publications

  1. Dependent interviewing and sub-optimal responding

    Eggs Johannes and Annette Jäckle

    1. Welfare Benefits
    2. Survey Methodology

#522692


Research home

Research home

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest