Skip to content

ISER Working Paper Series 2007-22

Inequality and quiescence: a continuing conundrum

Authors

Publication date

24 Sep 2007

Abstract

How may we account for the fact that most people appear to accept widespread social and economic inequalities? This is a question that has often been posed in the social sciences. One possible explanation is that individuals tend to make comparisons with others like themselves and so, as a result, do not appreciate the full range of inequality. This was the conclusion drawn by research in the 1960s and was re-affirmed by further research in the 1970s. However, more recently, it has been
suggested that social and economic change in the intervening period may have had effects on the range and type of comparisons people are able to make. In particular, it has been argued that the growth of the mass media has exposed people to a broader range of lifestyles and the expansion of the consumer society has created ever greater desires. In these circumstances, it is thought that people’s horizons will have expanded so that they no longer have such restricted points of reference for their
social comparisons. In this paper, we use evidence from a small scale pilot qualitative study to investigate social comparisons in the 21st century. We find that, in many ways, social comparisons are still narrow and knowledge of the true extent of inequality is still limited. What comparisons people do make appear to be based on lifestyle and consumption. Hence, they are neither resentful of the superrich,
nor of others closer to themselves who have done better in life. However, they are very aware of their advantages compared with less fortunate members of society. Our respondents see themselves as members of a comfortable middle mass of ‘ordinary, hard-working families’. The paper concludes with some reflections on the nature of social cohesion in the UK today.

Notes

working paper

Paper download  


Related publications

  1. Interview with Ray Pahl on 'Social Status'

    David Rose, Liz Spencer, and Ray Pahl

  2. Growing inequality: do people know what is going on?

    Ray Pahl, David Rose, and Liz Spencer

  3. A sound case for taxing top pay

    Ray Pahl, David Rose, and Liz Spencer

  4. The good life? But what about all these taxes?

    Ray Pahl, David Rose, and Liz Spencer

  5. The good life? But what about all these taxes?

    Ray Pahl, David Rose, and Liz Spencer

  6. The very rich versus the rich

    Ray Pahl, David Rose, and Liz Spencer

  7. The very rich versus the rich

    Ray Pahl, David Rose, and Liz Spencer

#509750


Research home

Research home

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest