Longitudinal changes in mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study

Publication type

Journal Article

Authors

Publication date

June 3, 2020

Summary:

Objective:
To examine longitudinal changes in the prevalence of mental health problems before and during the COVID-19 crisis in a large-scale population-based study and to identify population subgroups that are psychologically vulnerable during the pandemic.
Design and setting:
Longitudinal observational population study using data from the 2017 – 2019 and April 2020 waves of Understanding Society, the United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), a nationally representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom.
Participants:
12,090 men and women with a mean age of 49.9 (range 18 – 92) living in private households in the United Kingdom were drawn from the representative wave 9 (2017 – 2019) sample of the UKHLS and followed up between the 24th and 30th of April 2020.
Main outcome measure:
Mental health problems were measured using the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12), a validated and widely used measure of common mental health symptoms in population studies. The GHQ-12 score cut-off (score of 3 or more) for “psychiatric caseness” (i.e. likely to present with psychiatric disorder) was used to estimate prevalence of mental health problems.
Results:
The percentage of participants classified as experiencing mental health problems increased from 23.3% in 2017-2019 to 36.8% in April 2020. In a multivariate mixed effects logistic regression model all population subgroups examined showed statistically significant increases in mental health problems. Increases were most pronounced among young adults, females, and those with a higher level of education. The rise in mental health difficulties was 8.6 percentage points (95% CI: 4.1 to 13.2) greater among those aged 18-34 compared to those aged 50 – 64, 6.9 points (95% CI: 4.0 to 9.8) greater in females compared to males and 4 points (95% CI: 1.2, 6.9) greater amongst those with a university degree compared to others. Additional analyses of the full UKHLS dataset from 2009-2020 showed that the substantial increase in mental health problems observed in April 2020 was unlikely to be due to seasonality effects or year-to-year variation.
Conclusion:
This study contributes to a rapidly growing evidence base suggesting that mental health problems may have risen substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Published in

PsyArXiv

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qd5z7

Subjects

Notes

Open Access preprint

Is referenced by: Public Health England. (2020) 'COVID-19: mental health and wellbeing surveillance report'. London:Public Health England.


Related Publications

#526124

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest