Is that still the same? Has that changed? On the accuracy of measuring change with dependent interviewing

Publication type

Understanding Society Working Paper Series

Series Number

2016-06

Series

Understanding Society Working Paper Series

Authors

Publication date

August 22, 2016

Abstract:

We experimentally test how best to word proactive dependent interviewing questions, whereby respondents are reminded of their answer in the previous interview, before being asked about their current situation. First we test for differences in reporting of change between possible wording formats including independent interviewing, second we examine potential mechanisms through which the wording may affect responses, and third we link to administrative records to assert which wording provides the most accurate measures of change. The overall results suggest that reminding respondents of their previous answer and then asking “Is that still the case?” produces the most accurate data on change and stability experienced by individuals.

Subjects

Notes

PLEASE CITE AS: Jäckle, A. and Eckman, S. (2020) ‘Is that still the same? Has that changed? On the accuracy of measuring change with dependent interviewing', Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(4):706-725. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz021

---

Related Publications

• Is that still the same? Has that changed? On the accuracy of measuring change with dependent interviewing

  Annette Jäckle, Stephanie Eckman,

  Journal Article - 20200915

Paper download  

#523867