Publication type
Journal Article
Authors
Publication date
June 1, 2015
Summary:
There are considerable cost and timeliness advantages associated with web interviewing, compared to interviewer administration. However, web surveys do not perform well in terms of coverage and participation. To harness the strengths of both modes, existing probability-based interviewer administered surveys are therefore being pushed to consider a mixed mode approach, including web. We assess the effect of introducing web interviewing as part of a mixed-mode design in the context of an existing longitudinal survey in which sample members have previously been interviewed face-to-face. Using experimental data from a household panel survey in the UK, we find that the mixed mode design resulted in a lower proportion of households fully responding. However, more than one in five households fully responded online. Overall, individual response rates were also lower with the mixed mode design, and we were unable to identify any subgroups where the reverse was true. Also, item nonresponse rates were higher with the mixed mode design.
Published in
Survey Research Methods
Volume and page numbers
Volume: 9 , p.57 -70
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i1.5475
ISSN
18643361
Subjects
Link
https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/5475
Notes
Open Access journal
Related Publications
-
Going online with a face-to-face household panel: initial results from an experiment on the Understanding Society Innovation Panel
Annette Jäckle, Peter Lynn, Jonathan Burton,Understanding Society Working Paper Series - 20130315
#522952