An experimental analysis of the impact of survey design on measures and models of subjective wellbeing

Publication type

ISER Working Paper Series

Series Number

2010-20

Series

ISER Working Paper Series

Author

Publication date

June 24, 2010

Abstract:

We analyse the results of experiments on aspects of the design of questionnaire and interview mode in the 2009 wave of the new UK Understanding Society panel survey. The randomised experiments relate to job- and life-satisfaction questions and vary the labeling of response scales, the mode of interviewing and the location of questions within the interview. We find a highly significant impact of these design features on the distributions of reported satisfaction in various life domains and some important impacts on the findings from conventional cross-section models of satisfaction.

Subjects

Notes

Is referenced by OECD (2013) ‘Concept and validity’ in OECD ’OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being’. Paris: OECD Publishing. Ch.1: 27-59.

Is referenced by OECD (2013) ‘Methodological considerations in the measurement of subjective well-being’ in OECD ’OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being’. Paris: OECD Publishing. Ch.2: 61-138.

---

Related Publications

• An experimental analysis of the impact of survey design on measures and models of subjective wellbeing

  Stephen Pudney,

  Understanding Society Working Paper Series - 20100623

Paper download  

#513617