Publication type
Journal Article
Authors
Publication date
January 15, 2018
Summary:
A growing literature on inference in difference-in-differences (DiD) designs has been pessimistic about obtaining hypothesis tests of the correct size, particularly with few groups. We provide Monte Carlo evidence for four points: (i) it is possible to obtain tests of the correct size even with few groups, and in many settings very straightforward methods will achieve this; (ii) the main problem in DiD designs with grouped errors is instead low power to detect real effects; (iii) feasible GLS estimation combined with robust inference can increase power considerably whilst maintaining correct test size – again, even with few groups, and (iv) using OLS with robust inference can lead to a perverse relationship between power and panel length.
Published in
Journal of Econometric Methods
Volume
Volume: 7
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jem-2017-0005
ISSN
21566674
Subjects
Link
- http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/20372
Notes
Open Access
©2018 Thomas F. Crossley et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0
Related Publications
-
Inference with difference-in-differences revisited
Mike Brewer, Thomas F. Crossley, Robert Joyce,Research Paper - 20131115
#524871