Skip to content

Research Paper STICERD Public Economics Programme -PEP- PEP 08

Trends in individual income growth: measurement methods and British evidence

Authors

Publication date

Feb 2011

Abstract

Assessments of whose income growth is the greatest and whose is the smallest are typically based on comparisons of income changes for income groups (e.g. rich versus poor) or income values (e.g. quantiles). However, income group and quantile composition changes over time because of income mobility. To summarize patterns of income growth while also tracking the fortunes of the same individuals, a longitudinal perspective is required. For this case, we develop dominance conditions and summary indices for comparisons of distributions of individual income growth, together with associated methods of estimation and inference. Using these methods and data from the British Household Panel Survey, we study individual income growth for periods between 1991 and 2005. We show that income growth was significantly more pro-poor in the early years of the Labour government than in earlier Conservative years.

Links

http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/abstract.asp?index=3768


Related publications

  1. Trends in individual income growth: measurement methods and British evidence

    Stephen P. Jenkins and Philippe Van Kerm

  2. Trends in individual income growth: measurement methods and British evidence

    Stephen P. Jenkins and Philippe Van Kerm

#522114


Research home

Research home

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest