Skip to content

Journal Article

Automatic stabilizers and economic crisis: US vs. Europe

Authors

Publication date

Apr 2012

Summary

This paper analyzes the effectiveness of the tax and transfer systems in
the EU and the US to provide income insurance through automatic
stabilization in the recent economic crisis. We find that automatic
stabilizers absorb 38% of a proportional income shock in the EU,
compared to 32% in the US. In the case of an unemployment shock 47% of
the shock is absorbed in the EU, compared to 34% in the US. This
cushioning of disposable income leads to a demand stabilization of up to
30% in the EU and up to 20% in the US. There is large heterogeneity
within the EU. Automatic stabilizers in Eastern and Southern Europe are
much lower than in Central and Northern European countries. We also
investigate whether countries with weak automatic stabilizers have
enacted larger fiscal stimulus programs.

Published in

Journal of Public Economics

Volume and page numbers

96 , 279 -294

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.11.001

ISSN

16

Subjects

Welfare Benefits, Microsimulation, and Taxation

Links

http://serlib0.essex.ac.uk/record=b1650552~S5

Notes

Albert Sloman Library Periodicals *restricted to Univ. Essex registered users*


Related publications

  1. Automatic stabilisers and economic crisis: US vs Europe

    Mathias Dolls, Clemens Fuest, and Andreas Peichl

    1. Welfare Benefits
    2. Microsimulation
    3. Taxation

#521360


Research home

Research home

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest