Skip to content

Journal Article

Subjective well-being, income and relative concerns in the UK

Authors

Publication date

Aug 2013

Summary

We present an empirical model aimed at testing the relative income
hypothesis and the effect of deprivation relative to mean income on
subjective well-being. The main concern is to deal with subjective panel
data in an ordered response model where error homoskedasticity is not
assumed. A heteroskedastic pooled panel ordered probit model with
unobserved individual-specific effects is applied to micro-data
available in the British Household Panel Survey for 1996–2007. In this
framework, absolute income impacts negatively on both completely
satisfied and dissatisfied individuals, while relative income affects
positively the most satisfied ones. Such an effect is asymmetric,
impacting more severely on the relatively poor in the reference group.
We argue that our results buttress the validity of the relative income
hypothesis as an explanation of the happiness paradox.

Published in

Social Indicators Research

Volume and page numbers

113 , 81 -105

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11205-012-0083-z

ISSN

16

Subjects

Income Dynamics and Well Being

Notes

Not held in Res Lib - bibliographic reference only

#521160


Research home

Research home

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest