Skip to content

Journal Article

Causes of Mode Effects: Separating out Interviewer and Stimulus Effects in Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Telephone Surveys

Authors

Publication date

01 Jan 2007

Abstract

We identify the causes of mode effects in comparisons of face-to-face and telephone surveys, by testing for differences in the extent of satisficing and social desirability bias due to differences in the stimulus (visual vs. aural presentation of response options) and the presence vs. absence of the interviewer. The stimulus did not lead to differential measurement error; the presence or absence of the interviewer however did. Telephone respondents were far more likely to give socially desirable responses than face-to-face respondents when the stimulus was the same for both modes.

Published in

Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association

Links

http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/

Notes

Online free - http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/y2006/Files/JSM2006-000424.pdf

JSM proceedings


Related publications

  1. Causes of Mode Effects: Separating out Interviewer and Stimulus Effects in Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Telephone Surveys

    Caroline Roberts, Annette Jäckle, and Peter Lynn

  2. Causes of Mode Effects: Separating out Interviewer and Stimulus Effects in Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Telephone Surveys

    Caroline Roberts, Annette Jäckle, and Peter Lynn

#519366


Research home

Research home

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest