Skip to content

Book Chapter Survey Nonresponse 9

The effects of extended interviewer efforts on nonresponse bias

Authors

Editors

Robert Groves, Don Dillman, John Eltinge, and Rod Little

Publication date

01 Jan 2002

Abstract

Though rarely stated explicitly, an important rationale for wanting to maximise response rate is an assumption that this will bring greater gains in accuracy of estimation than simply increasing the selected sample size. In other words, it is assumed that adding in hard-to-get respondents will not merely improve precision, but will reduce non-response bias. In this paper, we examine two distinct components of the difficulty of achieving an interview: difficulty of contacting sample members ('ease of contact') and difficulty of obtaining co-operation once contact is made ('reluctance to co-operate'). We assess the separate and combined effects of ease of contact and reluctance on nonresponse bias in order to estimate the impact of extended interviewer efforts on survey error and to answer subsidiary questions about the relative effectiveness of different types of extended efforts. Data come from the Family Resources Survey, Health Survey for England and British Social Attitudes Surveys.

Notes

Ch. not on CSText. Book in ISER library


Related publications

  1. The Effects of Extended Interviewer Efforts on Nonresponse Bias

    Peter Lynn, Paul Clarke, Jean Martin, et al.

#517286


Research home

Research home

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest