Publication type
Journal Article
Series Number
Authors
Publication date
November 3, 2025
Summary:
The expansion of female education in recent decades has reshaped assortative mating patterns in Western societies, reinforcing educational homogamy and fostering educational hypogamy. Despite the reversal of the gender gap in education, housework remains a woman’s task. Using data from Understanding Societies and adopting a cohort and couple-based perspective, we argue that because women generally experience lower returns on education than men do, education often covers the underlying socioeconomic hypergamy of women, contributing to the persistent uneven division of housework. The study employs multinomial logistic regression and hierarchical linear mixed models (HLMMs). The results indicate that men remain more likely to hold advantageous occupational positions and earn higher incomes, factors associated with more unequal divisions of housework. Additionally, while the combined effects of hypergamy in education, occupational status, and income lead to pronounced inequalities in housework time, combined hypogamy results in a smaller yet persistent gender gap, revealing a gender asymmetry in the impact of relative resources and the perpetuation of traditional gender roles. Notably, well-educated couples consistently exhibit the most egalitarian behaviours across all union configurations and cohorts. Overall, the study highlights the critical role of women’s achievements in relative status and income in fostering more egalitarian divisions of housework within couples while emphasising the transformative impact of tertiary education in challenging traditional gender roles.
Published in
Review of Economics of the Household
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-025-09815-z
ISSN
15695239
Subjects
Notes
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Online Early
#588819