A methylome-wide association study of major depression with out-of-sample case–control classification and trans-ancestry comparison

Publication type

Journal Article

Series Number

Authors

Publication date

October 1, 2025

Summary:

Major Depression (MD) is a leading cause of global disease burden, and both experimental and population-based studies suggest that differences in DNA methylation (DNAm) may be associated with the condition. However, previous DNAm studies have not so far been widely replicated, suggesting a need for larger meta-analysis studies. In the present study, the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Major Depressive Disorder working group conducted a meta-analysis of methylome-wide association analysis (MWAS) for life-time MD across 18 studies of 24,754 European-ancestry participants (5,443 MD cases) and an East Asian sample (243 cases, 1846 controls). We identified fifteen CpG sites associated with lifetime MD with methylome-wide significance (p < 6.42×10-8). Top CpG effect sizes in European ancestries were positively correlated with those from an independent East Asian MWAS (r = 0.482 and p = 0.068 for significant CpG sites, r = 0.261 and p = 0.009 for the top 100 CpG sites). Methylation score (MS) created using the MWAS summary statistics was significantly associated with MD status in an out-of-sample classification analysis (β = 0.122, p = 0.005, AUC = 0.53). MS was also associated with five inflammatory markers, with the strongest association found with Tumor Necrosis Factor Beta (β=-0.154, p=1.5×10-5). Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis demonstrated that 23 CpG sites were potentially causally associated with MD and six of those were replicated in an independent mQTL dataset (Wald’s ratio test, absolute β ranged from 0.056 to 0.932, p ranged from 7×10-3 to 4.58×10-6). CpG sites located in the Major Histocompatibility complex (MHC) region showed the strongest evidence from MR analysis of being associated with MD. Our study provides evidence that variations in DNA methylation are associated with MD, and further evidence supporting involvement of the immune system. Larger sample sizes in diverse ancestries are likely to reveal replicable associations to improve mechanistic inferences with the potential to inform molecular target identification.

Published in

Nature Mental Health

Volume and page numbers

Volume: 3 , p.1152 -1167

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00486-4

ISSN

27316076

Subjects

Notes

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

#588795

---

Related Publications

• A methylome-wide association study of major depression with out-of-sample case-control classification and trans-ancestry comparison

  1. Xueyi Shen
  2. Miruna Barbu
  3. Doretta Caramaschi
  4. Ryan Arathimos
  5. Darina Czamara
  6. Friederike S. David
  7. Anna Dearman
  8. Evelyn Dilkes
  9. Marisol Herrera-Rivero
  10. Floris Huider
  11. Luise Kühn
  12. Kuan-Chen Lu
  13. Teemu Palviainen
  14. Alicia Marie Schowe
  15. Gemma Shireby
  16. Antoine Weihs
  17. Chloe C.Y. Wong
  18. Eleanor Davyson
  19. Hannah Casey
  20. Mark J. Adams
  21. Antje-Kathrin Allgaier
  22. Joe Burrage
  23. Avshalom Caspi
  24. Ricardo Costeira
  25. Erin C. Dunn
  26. Lisa Feldmann
  27. Josef Frank
  28. Franz Joseph Freisleder
  29. Danni A. Gadd
  30. Ellen Greimel
  31. Eilis Hannon
  32. Sarah E. Harris
  33. Georg Homuth
  34. David M. Howard
  35. Stella Iurato
  36. Tellervo Korhonen
  37. Tzu-Pin Lu
  38. Nicholas G. Martin
  39. Jade Martins
  40. Edel McDermott
  41. Susanne Meinert
  42. Pau Navarro
  43. Miina Ollikainen
  44. Verena Pehl
  45. Charlotte Piechaczek
  46. Aline D. Scherff
  47. Frederike Stein
  48. Fabian Streit
  49. Alexander Teumer
  50. Henry Völzke
  51. Jenny van Dongen
  52. Rosie M. Walker
  53. Natan Yusupov
  54. Louise Arseneault
  55. Jordana T. Bell
  56. Klaus Berger
  57. Elisabeth Binder
  58. Dorret I. Boomsma
  59. Simon R. Cox
  60. Udo Dannlowski
  61. Kathryn L. Evans
  62. Helen L. Fisher
  63. Andreas J. Forstner
  64. Hans J. Grabe
  65. Jaakko Kaprio
  66. Tilo Kircher
  67. Johannes Kopf-Beck
  68. Meena Kumari
  69. Po-Hsiu Kuo
  70. Qingqin S. Li
  71. Terrie E. Moffitt
  72. Hugh Mulcahy
  73. Therese M. Murphy
  74. Gerd Schulte-Körne
  75. Jonathan Mill
  76. Cathryn M. Lewis
  77. Naomi R. Wray
  78. Andrew M. McIntosh

  Journal Article
  October 28, 2023