Skip to content

Research Paper CMPO Working Papers University of Bristol 07/173

Keeping up with the Schmidts: an empirical test of relative deprivation theory in the neighbourhood context

Authors

Publication date

01 Jun 2007

Abstract

We test empirically whether people's life satisfaction depends on their relative income position in the neighbourhood, drawing on a unique dataset, the German Socio-economic Panel Study (SOEP) matched with micro-marketing indicators of population characteristics. Relative deprivation theory suggests that individuals are happier the better their relative income position in the neighbourhood is. To test this theory we estimate micro-economic happiness models for the years 1994 and 1999 with
controls for own income and for neighbourhood income at the zip-code level (roughly 9,000 people). There exist no negative and no statistically significant associations between neighbourhood income and life satisfaction, which refutes relative deprivation theory. If anything, we find positive associations between neighbourhood income and happiness in all cross-sectional models and this is robust to a number of robustness tests, including adding in more controls for neighbourhood quality, changing the outcome variable, and interacting neighbourhood income with indicators that proxy the extent to which individuals may be assumed to interact with their neighbours. We argue that the scale at which we measure neighbourhood characteristics may be too large still to identify the comparison effect sought after.

Links

http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/publications/papers/


Related publications

  1. Keeping Up With The Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

  2. Keeping up with the Schmidts: an empirical test of relative deprivation theory in the neighbourhood context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

    1. Area Effects
    2. Well Being
  3. Keeping up with the Schmidts: an empirical test of relative deprivation theory in the neighbourhood context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

    1. Area Effects
    2. Well Being
  4. Keeping Up With The Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

  5. Keeping up with the Schmidts: an empirical test of relative deprivation theory in the neighbourhood context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

  6. Keeping Up With The Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

  7. Keeping Up With The Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

  8. Keeping Up With The Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

  9. Keeping Up With The Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context

    Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess, and Carol Propper

#519498


Research home

Research home

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest