Are flexible contracts bad for workers? Evidence from job satisfaction data

Publication type

Research Paper

Series Number

2007/042

Series

Lancaster University Management School Working Paper

Authors

Publication date

June 1, 2007

Abstract:

If workers can choose between permanent and flexible contracts, compensating wage differentials should arise to equalize on-the-job utility in the two types of contracts. Estimating job satisfaction using the British Household Panel Survey shows that agency and casual contracts are associated with routinely lower satisfaction. This results because the low job satisfaction associated with less job security is not offset by higher compensation or other job characteristics. Job security is sufficiently important that holding constant this one facet of satisfaction eliminates the overall gap in job satisfaction between flexible and permanent contracts.

Subjects

Link

- http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/lanwpaper/005276.htm

Notes

Econpapers search

working paper

#510595

News

Latest findings, new research

Publications search

Search all research by subject and author

Podcasts

Researchers discuss their findings and what they mean for society

Projects

Background and context, methods and data, aims and outputs

Events

Conferences, seminars and workshops

Survey methodology

Specialist research, practice and study

Taking the long view

ISER's annual report

Themes

Key research themes and areas of interest